[directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree

To: directfb-users@directfb.org
Subject: [directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree
From: Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@sci.fi>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:34:21 +0200
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-reply-to: <3FB78DA4.6090609@nicolas.educnat>; from tarass@club-internet.fr on Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:45:56PM +0100
Mail-followup-to: directfb-users@directfb.org
References: <3FB78DA4.6090609@nicolas.educnat>
Sender: directfb-users-bounce@directfb.org

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:45:56PM +0100, tarass@club-internet.fr wrote:
> It founds my Matrox G500 and 32Mb
> but fbset -i gives

>      MMIO Size   : 16384
>      Accelerator : Matrox G400
> 
> Only G400 and 16 Mb

16MB because you didn't use the full-memory patch.

The G400 part is fine. Matroxfb doesn't bother reporting if the chip is 
G400, G450 or G550.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
syrjala@sci.fi
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/


--
Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@directfb.org with
"unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.

Follow-Ups:
- [directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree
  - From: Bérci Norbert <bercin@vnet.hu>

References:
- [directfb-users] fbset and kernel disagree
  - From: tarass@club-internet.fr

Prev by Date: [directfb-users] Re: matrox irq patch
Next by Date: [directfb-users] Re: Freebsd, DirectFB
Previous by thread: [directfb-users] fbset and kernel disagree
Next by thread: [directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index