|Site sponsored by IGEL|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:35:03PM +0100, Bérci Norbert wrote: > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > >>Anyway, what is the correct behaviour if I want to use > >> - only the first > >> - both heads? > > > > matroxfb's second head support isn't used with DirectFB's CRTC2 code. > > Does it mean that I do not have to even compile in matroxfb's second > head support, to use the second head through DirectFB? 2.4.22 always builds second head support for G450/G550. With a G400 you don't need to build second head support but you must enable I2C support. G450/G550 don't need I2C. -- Ville Syrjälä email@example.com http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to firstname.lastname@example.org with "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.