DirectFB - Home of the pragmatist Roadmap


[directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree
Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree



On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:35:03PM +0100, Bérci Norbert wrote:
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> 
> >>Anyway, what is the correct behaviour if I want to use
> >>  - only the first
> >>  - both heads?
> > 
> > matroxfb's second head support isn't used with DirectFB's CRTC2 code.
> 
> Does it mean that I do not have to even compile in matroxfb's second 
> head support, to use the second head through DirectFB?

2.4.22 always builds second head support for G450/G550. With a G400 you
don't need to build second head support but you must enable I2C support.
G450/G550 don't need I2C.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
syrjala@sci.fi
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/


--
Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@directfb.org with
"unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index


directfb.org / Development / Old Archives