DirectFB - Home of the pragmatist Roadmap

[directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree
Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[directfb-users] Re: fbset and kernel disagree

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:35:03PM +0100, Bérci Norbert wrote:
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>Anyway, what is the correct behaviour if I want to use
> >>  - only the first
> >>  - both heads?
> > 
> > matroxfb's second head support isn't used with DirectFB's CRTC2 code.
> Does it mean that I do not have to even compile in matroxfb's second 
> head support, to use the second head through DirectFB?

2.4.22 always builds second head support for G450/G550. With a G400 you
don't need to build second head support but you must enable I2C support.
G450/G550 don't need I2C.

Ville Syrjälä

Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to with
"unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index / Development / Old Archives