[directfb-users] Re: Which License?

To: seth@beere.org
Subject: [directfb-users] Re: Which License?
From: Sven Neumann <neo@convergence.de>
Date: 16 Feb 2004 16:44:12 +0100
Cc: directfb-users@directfb.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-reply-to: <20040216152524.M65078@beere.org>
Organization: convergence GmbH
References: <20040216152524.M65078@beere.org>
Sender: directfb-users-bounce@directfb.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Hi,

"Seth Moore" <seth@beere.org> writes:

> I'm a bit confused about the licensing terms for directfb and
> gtk+-directfb.  Are they GPL or LGPL?  I've gotten the impression
> that directfb switched to the LGPL at some point, but I see the GPL
> mentioned in file directfb.spec (release 0.9.20).

The DirectFB license is LGPL and has always been. The spec file is
wrong; I will get it fixed.


Sven


-- 
Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@directfb.org with 
"unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.

Follow-Ups:
- [directfb-users] Gradation effect in DirectFB ?
  - From: Manoj Kumar Bhatta <mkbhatta@yahoo.com>
- [directfb-users] Display Layer use and Gradation for window
  - From: Manoj Kumar Bhatta <mkbhatta@yahoo.com>

References:
- [directfb-users] Which License?
  - From: "Seth Moore" <seth@beere.org>

Prev by Date: [directfb-users] Which License?
Next by Date: [directfb-users] Re: Radeon & DVI
Previous by thread: [directfb-users] Which License?
Next by thread: [directfb-users] Gradation effect in DirectFB ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index